Once you think that the left couldn’t get any more depraved, they go and pull something incredibly grotesque and unseemly: pedophilia. Of course, that’s a highly accusatory statement, and definitely worthy of the proverbial bomb going off, so let’s go ahead and back up here just a little bit first.
Once you think that the left couldn’t get any more depraved, they go and pull something incredibly grotesque and unseemly: pedophilia. Of course, that’s a highly accusatory statement, and definitely worthy of the proverbial bomb going off, so let’s go ahead and back up here just a little bit first.
Of course, like many others, I have some fond memories of my childhood. Yes, I had some bossy much-older siblings, but I remember binge-watching Disney TV shows, going out trick or treating during Halloween, wondering what type of Christmas present I was going to get, or simply just going out on a stroll and enjoying the day. The one thing I didn’t have to worry about was my innocence, which is something that once you lose it, you can never get it back.
However, when it comes to this appalling monstrosity that we all know as pedophilia, there is a growing subset of children that are going to recall their childhood very differently. Just think of the pride parades and the LGBT propaganda that is out there today. Of course, if you are liberal, you probably think, “so what?” Well, there are children as young as seven years old participating in these parades!
Unfortunately, what we have here is an effort to take the natural curiosity, openness, and naivety that is inherent in childhood and hijack it to make a divergent sexual ethic more normalized.
This pedophilia and depraved interest in children is strictly from an ideological standpoint either. It is becoming increasingly obvious that there are those who have a creepy obsession that involves children in their personal sexual tastes, and they are going to use any leverage to do so. The left has a pedophilia problem, and it is getting worse, not better.
One YouTube personality, in particular, was made painstakingly aware of this fact when they were attending the 2019 San Francisco Gay Pride Parade in order to interview some of the attendees for his YouTube channel. He quickly discovered at least one honest marcher who was “down for the kink with kids” saying that he only believed that “age is a construct.”
Yet another demonstrator educated this YouTube personality, telling him that he thought that kids doing drag is “so cool”, and that “love has no age.” He went on by making a Freudian slip where he admitted that there was even a child drag queen that was born in a gay nightclub that was being tipped in the same manner that “you would do with strippers.”
Indeed, you might still be skeptical. Surely this world hasn’t slipped that far, you might say to yourself. Well, all you have to do is look at this combination of Vice articles from people that claim that they are “non-offending” pedophiles. However, several of these individuals go ahead and become “offending” pedophiles in the wind-up. One man was even a foster parent who was later accused of sexually assaulting one of the children in his care.
Of course, you’re probably thinking to yourself, “well, Vice is probably an ultra-liberal publication, and sure they are alone and on the fringes in regards to this.” Well, think again. There was a New York Times article called “What’s the Best Way to Protect Sex Workers? Depends on Whom You Ask” and this piece actually opened with the line “TS Candii first traded sex at age 13.” Traded? Excuse me, New York Times? That’s pedophilia, not trading sex.
Moreover, this article also presents a glowing report on the pedophilic, serial rape of a child who had been forced to become a prostitute after “she was kicked out of the family home.” However, there is good news here. She eventually wound up “taking refuge with a group of older transgender women who became her mentors” and “taught her how to support herself through sex.”
Of course, normal people would think that this sounds like a group of perverted individuals pimping out a helpless and homeless child for sex. Why are euphemisms being used to try and obscure what this really is? Could it be that the left has a pedophilia problem?
Unfortunately, there have even been pieces published in such dyed-in-the-wool publications as the Washington Post.
Additionally, there was an associate professor at Yale named Joe Fischel who wrote an article called “Keep Pride Nude” where he poses the question, “What is the presumptive harm if a child …. sees an adult’s butt cheeks, or even an adult’s genitals or breasts?” Fischel’s article then goes on to advocate for children to be exposed to an immense amount of other perversions, even speaking the language of groomers. But hold on, he wasn’t done yet. Fischel went on to attempt to justify his perverse ideology by saying that the children “might like it.”
Meanwhile, we have GQ sex columnist Flora Gill advocating for creating “porn for children.” You cannot make this stuff up.
Unfortunately, there are plenty of other examples, and it is simply too time-consuming to list them all. How should we as conservatives deal with this? Well, for starters, we have got to start calling a spade a spade here. We have got to stop being politically correct. The laws need to be enforced, or we may not even have a country left here in a few years.