An Australian research team is about to publish shocking new findings which indicate the Chinese are lying. The COVID-19 coronavirus “contains unique properties suggesting it was manipulated in a Chinese laboratory.”
Research points to designer genes
A team of five research scientists are contradicting China’s official story on the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 strain of coronavirus. The World Health Organization may believe what Xi Jinping is telling them but Nikolai Petrovsky and his team aren’t buying it. There’s no way this pathogen “evolved” in nature. It’s “unusual abilities” point to designer genes.
Contrary to the Chinese narrative that the virus “can be found in other animals, including bats,” Petrovsky found “no sign” of confirmation. Bats and other “exotic wildlife” may be sold as meat in the local market but this virus didn’t come from there. Instead, it probably came from China’s “major laboratory studying such viruses,” right there in Wuhan.
Petrovsky’s group used computer modeling of the virus’ ability to infect various animals, including humans. Their report was posted on Cornell University’s website May 13 for “peer-review.” What they found is that “the unmatched ability of the virus’ protruding spike to infect human cells” strongly indicates “human manipulation in Wuhan.”
Tailor made to infect humans
Dr. Petrovsky was shocked to see how much better the virus was at infecting humans than other animals, noting, “The virus’ binding strength for human cells ‘far exceeds’ similar properties for infecting other animals.” That’s a big clue. “This, plus the fact that no corresponding virus has been found to exist in nature, leads to the possibility that COVID-19 is a human-created virus.”
According to the findings of the team based in Adelaide, Australia, “It is therefore entirely plausible that the virus was created in the biosecurity facility in Wuhan by selection on cells expressing human ACE2, a laboratory that was known to be cultivating exotic bat coronaviruses at the time.”
That matches up with what a Chinese research team previously reported, when the translated version of their paper noted “somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus.”
Research shows human intervention
It’s much more likely, Petrovsky insists, that a “laboratory-treated coronavirus also could have escaped the facility through an accidental infection of a staff member who then visited the Wuhan wild animal market.” It’s hard to tell because the bio-hazard lab wasn’t very good at proper “disposal of medical waste.” All it would take is for “a cat or other animal” to come “into contact with infected waste.” Also, this virus evolves ultra-fast.
The Australians point out that “the quick evolution of the coronavirus and its unique ability to infect humans are either a remarkable coincidence or a sign of human intervention.” China continues to call it a coincidence.
A spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry strongly denies “that the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which houses China’s high-security laboratory studying pathogens, was the source of the outbreak.” Their top research scientist on the subject, nicknamed the “Batwoman” claims “she is convinced after a review that her lab played no role in the virus’ spread.”
Dr. Deep State is lying too
Petrovsky says Dr. Deep State, Anthony Fauci is lying too. Fauci backs the official story that it’s a natural pathogen. “If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated.” Fauci is convinced that “everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species.”
That isn’t what the Australians say. They conclude that “the binding energy of the virus’ ‘spike’ protein — the crownlike protrusions surrounding the surface of the round microbe — is highest for humans and greater than all other species tested, including bats, which have been widely targeted as the likely original source. What that means specifically is “that SARS-CoV-2 is a highly adapted human pathogen.” There is no way it could have evolved naturally to be this efficient at infecting humans.
“Overall,” the report concludes, “the data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is uniquely adapted to infect humans, raising important questions as to whether it arose in nature by a rare chance event or whether its origins might lie elsewhere.” A research professor in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, agrees. “Several scientists with obvious conflicts of interest have been permitted to go on the record denying that it would be possible to generate such a virus in a laboratory and stating specifically that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would never have been chosen by any ‘gene jockey,'” he emailed to the Washington Times.
Getting the origin right is crucial. “Understanding the exact origin of this virus is vital to ensure that all scientific and medical data are interpreted correctly by policymakers and health care professionals alike.” It looks intentional too. “Both of these denials are not genuine scientific rebuttals, but rather semantic pseudo-denials formulated by some of those most closely tied to the funding of these [gain of function] research lines.” Gain-of-function research means taking a virus and tuning it up to “increase the ability of pathogens to cause disease.”