Former VP of Pfizer Wants to Stop Women from Taking the Vaccine, Here is Why

Former VP of Pfizer Wants to Stop Women from Taking the Vaccine, Here is Why

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer, has revealed his reasons for telling women to reject the vaccine.

With no long-term studies about the COVID vaccine’s side effects, it is truly a wonder how so many people are willing get vaccinated. It is even more concerning that so many women, especially of child-bearing age, are getting this experimental vaccine without knowing its effects on fertility.

Further, even the CDC has come out and said that the vaccine doesn’t prevent the transmission of the virus, so why is there such a strong push for everyone to get vaccinated?

Dr. Michael Yeadon addressed some of these concerns during the “Stop the Shot” Conference on August 4th.

Dr. Yeadon’s Credentials

Yeadon has degrees in biochemistry and toxicology, as well as a PhD in respiratory pharmacology, and has worked for 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry. He retired from his position at Pfizer in 2011, and went on to found his own biotech company, Ziarco, which was later sold to Novartis, the world’s largest drug company, in 2017.

His Concerns

“You’re being lied to, I’m being lied to,” Yeadon said. “The authorities are not giving us full information about the risks of these products.”

Calling his first point “so obvious,” the former Pfizer VP stated: “We never, ever, give experimental medicines to pregnant women. Why do we not do that?”

Yeadon went on to detail the horrific consequences of experimental drugs for women, describing how, 60 years ago, they were “exposed to a new product for morning sickness called thalidomide and it led to at least 10,000 birth malformations.”

Studies that were conducted on the morning sickness drug prior to releasing it were not capable of identifying “thalidomide as a toxin in the womb,” he said, adding that the tragedy taught scientists that “babies are not safe and protected inside the uterus, which is what we used to think. But, in fact, they’re a miracle of minute development. Critical stages, especially in the early stages, where if interfered with biochemicals or something else, can change the course of development of that child irreparably.”

“You never ever give inadequately tested medicines, medicinal products, to a pregnant woman,” Yeadon emphasized. “And that is exactly what is happening. Our government is urging pregnant women, and women of childbearing age, to get vaccinated. And they’re telling them they’re safe. And that’s a lie because those studies have simply not been done.”

“Reproductive toxicology has not been undertaken with any of these products, certainly not a full battery of tests that you would want,” he added.

“So, here we are. There’s been potentially hundreds of millions of women of child-bearing potential [injected] with products which are untested in terms of impacts on fertilization and development of the baby,” Yeadon continued.

“That’s bad enough because what that tells me is that there’s recklessness. No one cares. The authorities do not care what happens,” the former Pfizer VP said.

Further, Yeadon revealed that two other studies show that the situation is “much worse,” as evidence of actual damaging effects on fertility was found.

One study conducted on rats revealed concerning results.

“What we find is the vaccine doesn’t just distribute around the body and then wash out again, which is what you’d hope. It concentrates in ovaries of rats, and it concentrates at least 20-fold over the concentration in other background tissues like muscles,” Yeadon stated.

“You don’t want this product in your ovaries. It’s simply not necessary to induce immunity to have a vaccine in your ovaries. And, as it’s concentrating in the ovaries, getting higher concentrations over time, they have not even defined what the maximum levels are or when that occurs,” the former Pfizer VP emphasized.

“So, now we have a second problem, that the vaccine, at least in a rat, distributes into the ovaries. And I will tell you, a general rule of thumb in toxicology is if you don’t have any data to contradict what you’ve learned, that’s the assumption you make for humans. So, my assumption at the moment is that is what is happening to every female who’s been given these vaccines. These vaccines are concentrating in her ovaries,” Yeadon added.

“It is very worrying. So, we don’t know what that will do, but it cannot be benign, and it could be seriously harmful because the vaccines will then express the coronavirus spike protein, and we know that there are unwanted [results] from that spike protein,” he continued.

In his final point, which Yeadon described as “even worse” because the experiments were done on humans, he discussed a petition he sent to the European Medicines Agency alongside another physician from Germany in December of 2020.

One of the concerns from the petition was that “the spike protein is faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta, something that’s absolutely required for both fertilization and formation, and maintenance of the placenta. So, you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way.”

Noting that the coronavirus spike protein was “similar enough,” Yeadon added: “I wanted them to do some experiments, hopefully to rule out the possibility that when you vaccinate the person, who then makes spike proteins, and they develop immune response against this spike protein,” that it would not issue “a faint signal that would potentially bind this similar protein in the placenta.”

Of course, his petition was ignored. But, Yeadon said that “a study has just come out a few weeks ago, and it says exactly what I was worried about.”

“Fifteen women were given the Pfizer vaccine. They drew blood samples every few days. When they measured antibodies against spike protein, which took several weeks to appear, they also measured antibodies against the placenta and they found that within the first one to four days an increase of two and a half to three times. That’s a 300% increase in the antibodies against their own placenta in the first four days,” the former Pfizer VP explained.

“So, I’m sorry to say this, but that is a vaccine-induced autoimmune attack on their own placenta. And I think you can only expect that that is happening in every woman of childbearing potential. It’s generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy,” Yeadon continued.

“Now, what the effect will be, we can’t be certain. Again, it can’t be benign. I don’t know whether it is enough to cause first trimester losses, but I would think it would, because I’ve looked at the literature. Women who are unfortunate enough to have what are called autoimmune diseases seem to have a higher rate of first trimester losses and what this vaccine has done is induced an auto-immune response,” the former Pfizer VP added.

“So, I’m here to warn you that if you are of childbearing potential, or younger, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines,” Yeadon concluded.