This week, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) made an announcement that stunned both the media and Democrats.
Senator Paul put everyone on alert that he is more than willing to reveal the secret identity of the Ukraine phone call whistleblower.
Unmasking the Whistleblower
Paul made his announcement over two days, starting with the rally on Monday night.
Paul stated, “We also now know the name of the whistleblower.
“The whistleblower needs to come forward as a material witness because he worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was getting money from corrupt oligarchs.”
The media immediately latched onto his words and demanded clarity from Senator Paul on Tuesday.
When asked about his statements, Paul stated that he probably will reveal the identity of the whistleblower at “some point.”
Paul stated, “I’m more than willing to, and I probably will at some point.
“There is no law preventing anybody from saying the name.”
When the reporter pushed back and told Paul there was a law preventing him from doing so, he corrected her, stating, “The whistleblower statute protects the whistleblower from having his name revealed by the inspector general.
“Even the New York Times admits that no one else is under any legal obligation.
He later added, “The whistleblower is actually a material witness completely separate from being the whistleblower because he worked for Joe Biden.
“He worked for Joe Biden at the same time Hunter Biden was receiving $50,000 a month.
“So, the investigation into the corruption of Hunter Biden involves this whistleblower because he was there at the time.
“Did he bring up the conflict of interest? Was there discussion of this? What was his involvement with the relationship between Joe Biden and the prosecutors?
“There’s a lot of questions the whistleblower needs to answer.”
What Dems Don’t Want You to Know
The reason Dems don’t want this information out there is that it is not going to take Americans very long to put two and two together here.
The alleged whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, is a CIA analyst who was formerly assigned to the National Security Council, where he worked with Joe Biden.
This is the same individual that was reportedly removed from that position in 2017 because the administration suspected him of leaking information to the media to undermine Trump.
When you add this together with the fact Burisma contacted the State Department in February 2016, a full month before Joe Biden went to Ukraine and threatened to withhold an aid check, it points to at the very least, Joe Biden lying, and in a worst-case scenario for Biden, that he purposely manipulated the situation to help his son, Hunter.
Either way, once this information is made public by the media (and it’s simply amazing the mainstream media is ignoring it), Joe Biden’s campaign could and should be over.