It’s a totally blatant tactic. Government suppression of conservative views. Since the propaganda hasn’t been working as well as expected, the liberal left had to steer Joe Biden into a heavier-handed approach. His handlers decided to go straight back to the basic techniques worked out by Hitler’s Gestapo.
Thought suppression in action
The thought suppression is obvious. Palace Minister of Imperial Justice Merrick Garland has instructed FBI agents and DOJ prosecutors to coerce “federal, state, tribal, territorial and local law enforcement leaders” into cracking down on parents who dare to question critical race theory and 1619 Project indoctrination.
The “harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school board members, teachers and workers in our nation’s public schools” has got to end. Canceling the curriculum which causes all the controversy isn’t considered an option for a single second, though.
On a rush basis, within the next 30 days, bureau agents and federal prosecutors are required to meet with their counterparts at the federal, state, tribal, territorial and local level.
The idea is to get everyone on the same page, with a clear understanding that questioning the official narrative is grounds for criminal prosecution. If that’s not chilling suppression of free speech and thought, what is?
They call the growing number of conservatives questioning the progressive way of thinking a “disturbing trend.” For some strange reason, suburban soccer mom’s don’t like the taste of the “white guilt” Kool-Aid. They question the automatic advantages their skin tone magically equips them with as a racist fairy tale.
The only answer to such rogue nationalism is suppression. The government is creating hotlines and databases to track the threat and haul offenders off to FEMA camp for reprogramming. The sessions mandated over the coming month “will open dedicated lines of communication for threat reporting, assessment and response by law enforcement.”
Neither the Attorney General's memo nor the full Justice Department press release cites any significant, credible threat.
This is a blatant suppression tactic, designed to dissuade citizens from participating in the democratic process at school boards.https://t.co/LItu8I1I0z
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 4, 2021
What’s considered a threat?
The feds make it sound good and legal on paper but opponents question the wording of the suppression orders. Is vowing to pull your child from a school which promotes critical race theory considered a threat?
Obviously, offering to slap around a teacher or teach a lesson to a school board member is a no-no but we already have laws on the books which cover that. There’s no need for special programs to round up thought criminals.
Garland has an answer for that. The talking points he was handed were ready for the objection. Yes, they do need special suppression programs, even though assault and battery covers the same ground. “Threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation’s core values.” Ahh, that makes it alright then.
“Those who dedicate their time and energy to ensuring that our children receive a proper education in a safe environment deserve to be able to do their work without fear for their safety.” If all they were teaching was reading, writing, and arithmetic they wouldn’t be getting death threats. It’s those Black Lives Matter posters in the hallway which are causing all the commotion.
In order to accomplish total suppression of conservative thought, “efforts are expected to include the creation of a task force, consisting of representatives from the department’s Criminal Division, National Security Division, Civil Rights Division, the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, the FBI, the Community Relations Service and the Office of Justice Programs.”
The DOJ will teach everyone to “help school board members and other potential victims understand the type of behavior that constitutes threats, how to report threatening conduct to the appropriate law enforcement agencies, and how to capture and preserve evidence of threatening conduct to aid in the investigation and prosecution of these crimes.” Expect your next call with the teacher to be taped.